Knocking two more books off of the list! I've watched the BBC's Sherlock, so it was interesting to read The Adventures of Sherlock Holmes and The Hound of the Baskervilles by Sir Arthur Conan Doyle to compare them to their originals. The true Sherlock Holmes is not a "high-functioning sociopath", but actually a completely friendly gentleman that really values Watson's companionship. At one point, he even showed concern for a lady's safety (gasp).
As for these selections, I suppose they were interesting enough. I don't know whether I prefer short form or long form, but either way, the reveals in both cases always ended up to be underwhelming. Yes, I understand that these iconic stories have been so overused at this point that it would be practically impossible not to know them, but it's disappointing when you read a story and are able to predict the outcome. Also, Watson and Sherlock are so damn wordy. Did everyone in olden times write multiple page-long prefaces before they got to the urgent point, or was that done to build anticipation for the sake of story? I guess that just goes to show how things have changed and how little attention span people have these days.
Despite those disappointments, I still think they were worth the read. I'm a little sad I didn't get to meet the original Moriarty though, because he really bothers me in the tv show (though I guess that's the point) and it would be nice to see if he's always been that way. Maybe another time.